I love reading Paul Krugman’s NY Times columns and especially the comments that follow because they offer a fascinating glimpse of certain moral principles that are completely alien to my personal philosophy. It is like going into a country where they seem to speak the same language; yet their words mean completely different things than [...]
Posts Tagged ‘economics’
Manzi on global warming
Posted in politics, tagged agw, climate change, economics, global warming, jim manzi, laws on June 30, 2009 | 6 Comments »
While I am not an expert on global warming, the available literature seems to indicate that when everything is considered, the damage of global warming is probably not as high as the damage of the proposed solutions to global warming. That’s of course not to discount the danger or reality of the phenomenon — global [...]
Assorted links
Posted in news and links, tagged auto, conficker, economics, internet, links, marijuana, nanny-state, obama, paternalism, worm on April 1, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
While GM and Chrysler are in their last throes, Ford is trudging on. Obama may have fired GM’s CEO and told Chrysler exactly what to do but he has had no such luck controlling Ford. The company has refused offers of taxpayer life support and believes it can not only survive this recession but in [...]
Peter Schiff: “Stimulus will lead to unmitigated disaster”
Posted in news and links, tagged austrian economics, crisis, depression, economics, inflation, peter schiff, recession, stimulus on February 10, 2009 | 1 Comment »
I present below, without comment, a recent interview of Schiff (investor, Austrian economist, accurate predictor of the current crisis) where he talks about the economic crisis and the stimulus. He predicts hyper-inflation worse than anything we have ever seen if we keep going down this path.
Some good signs from the Obama administration
Posted in politics, tagged economics, laws, legislation, nominee, obama, stimulus on February 4, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
• Tom Daschle — big government healthcare lord with plenty of tax issues – is out. Obama admits he screwed up. Refreshing. • He might actually kill the terrible protectionist clause from the stimulus. I certainly did not expect this. • He has selected an excellent nominee for the secretary of commerce post, it’s a Republican who once [...]
Keynesianism = trickle down effect?
Posted in personal, tagged discussion, economics, friends on January 31, 2009 | 1 Comment »
I was at a birthday party today when some of my friends started talking about the economic crisis and the stimulus. This is, more or less, how the conversation went. Person A : Well, once the stimulus is passed there should be more grants because the NSF is getting so much money. Person B : [...]
More Krugman nonsense
Posted in libertarianism, politics, tagged economics, paul krugman, stimulus on January 26, 2009 | 3 Comments »
[Post edited] From his latest column: [W]rite off anyone who asserts that it’s always better to cut taxes than to increase government spending because taxpayers, not bureaucrats, are the best judges of how to spend their money. Here’s how to think about this argument: it implies that we should shut down the air traffic control [...]
The Obama stimulus package
Posted in politics, tagged economics, financial crisis, money, obama, paul krugman, policy, stimulus, tax cuts, tyler cowen on January 5, 2009 | 1 Comment »
Tyler Cowen writes: Yes, 40 percent of the Obama stimulus package will be a tax cut. It’s already a talking point that “the Democrats have lost their nerve” but the reality is not so devious. Obama wishes to deliver on his pledge to cut taxes (always electorally popular) and upon close inspection the economic team [...]
Anecdotes and proposals on healthcare
Posted in libertarianism, tagged economics, health, healthcare, insurance, mandate, mandates, nanny-state, public health, regulation, single payer on January 4, 2009 | 1 Comment »
I missed this post by Andrew Sullivan from a while back. One reason I’m a conservative is the British National Health Service. Until you have lived under socialism, it sounds like a great idea. It isn’t misery – although watching my parents go through the system lately has been nerve-wracking – but there is a [...]
The worst article on the economy you will ever read
Posted in libertarianism, politics, tagged arianna huffington, article, bailout, bias, crisis, economics, economy, free markets, laissez-faire, rhetoric, statism on December 23, 2008 | 11 Comments »
Arianna Huffington’s latest article condemning laissez-faire as a failed philosophy hits all the right lefty notes. Parts of it almost seem lifted from Obama’s election rhetoric. Not wholly unexpected from a woman who once proclaimed that she only texts three people: her two teenage children and Barack Obama. Actually, Huffington’s piece is so bad that [...]
You should be opposed to an auto bailout irrespective of your ideology
Posted in politics, tagged auto bailout, bankruptcy, becker, costs, economics, government on December 16, 2008 | 5 Comments »
My position on the auto bailout is simple. The big three should be allowed to go bankrupt. This is true even if one ignores the moral hazard and other intrinsic costs of bailing out private firms. Bankruptcy now is, quite simply, the best course of action not just for the taxpayer and the rest of [...]
Bjorn Lomborg on global warming
Posted in libertarianism, sci, tech and gizmos, tagged al gore, analysis, bjorn lomborg, economics, facts, global warming, panic, rationality, reason, science, truth on December 14, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
Set aside 30 minutes today to watch this wonderful presentation by Bjorn Lomborg on global warming. Lomborg is no libertarian — he is a liberal who favours a welfare state and strong redistribution through taxation — and indeed, there is no mention of any intrinsic value of freedom and property rights in his presentation. His [...]
Obama’s sensible economics
Posted in politics, tagged economics, obama, oil, rhetoric, windfall profits on December 2, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
So far, Obama has proved to be a pragmatic centrist as far as economic policy is concerned. His decision to give quiet burial to the ridiculous windfall profits tax idea is further evidence that he didn’t mean much of the shrill left-wing rhetoric he used during the campaign season. That’s heartening.

